Sports Data Monopolies: Uncovering Their Rise and How We Got Here
(Part 2)

The sports data industry wasn’t always controlled by a handful of powerful players. In its early days, data collection was a decentralized process, often managed by leagues, teams, or even individual scouts. Information was gathered manually and shared with media outlets or other interested parties. However, as the value of sports data became increasingly apparent, the industry began to shift.

The rise of sports betting and the growing demand for real-time data transformed the landscape. Companies realized that controlling access to data could be incredibly lucrative, and they began to strike exclusive deals with leagues and organizations. These agreements gave them the sole right to collect and distribute data, effectively shutting out competitors. Over time, this led to the consolidation of power in the hands of a few major providers.

One of the key drivers of this consolidation was the willingness of data providers to pay large sums of money for exclusive rights. Leagues, often looking for ways to maximize revenue, were eager to sign these deals. However, this short-term gain came at a long-term cost. By handing over control of their data, leagues effectively gave up their ability to manage how their information was used and monetized.

Another factor was the lack of legal protections for sports data. Unlike intellectual property such as music or movies, facts, numbers, and figures are not protected by copyright law. This means that once a goal is scored or a match is played, the data surrounding that event is considered public domain. However, the exclusive agreements signed by leagues and data providers have created a de facto monopoly, as competitors are legally barred from collecting the same data independently.

The result is an industry that is heavily skewed in favor of a few dominant players. These providers have little incentive to innovate or improve their services, as they face no real competition. Meanwhile, leagues, media companies, and betting platforms are left with limited options and rising costs.

In the next part of this series, we’ll examine the broader implications of this monopolistic system, including its impact on innovation, competition, and the future of sports data.

Part 3 will be published on the 17th of February.